Firebird Documentation Index → Firebird 1.5 Language Ref. Update → DDL statements → CREATE TABLE |
Available in: DSQL, ESQL
Changed in: IB
Description: Any context variable that is assignment-compatible to the column datatype can be used as a default. This was already the case
in InterBase 6, but the Language Reference only mentioned USER
.
Example:
create table MyData ( id int not null primary key, record_created timestamp default current_timestamp, ... )
Changed in: IB
Description: If you create a foreign key without specifying a target column, it will reference the primary key of the target table. This was already the case in InterBase 6, but the IB Language Reference wrongly states that in such cases, the engine scans the target table for a column with the same name as the referencing column.
Example:
create table eik ( a int not null primary key, b int not null unique ); create table beuk ( b int references eik ); -- beuk.b references eik.a, not eik.b !
Changed in: 1.5
Description: In compliance with the SQL-99 standard, NULL
s – even multiple – are now allowed in columns with a UNIQUE constraint. It is therefore possible to define a UNIQUE key on a column that has no NOT NULL constraint.
For UNIQUE keys that span multiple columns, the logic is a little complicated:
Multiple rows having all the UK columns NULL
are allowed.
Multiple rows having a different subset of UK colums NULL
are allowed.
Multiple rows having the same subset of UK columns NULL
and the rest filled with regular values and those regular values differ in at least one column, are allowed.
Multiple rows having the same subset of UK columns NULL
and the rest filled with regular values and those regular values are the same in every column, are forbidden.
One way of summarizing this is as follows: In principle, all NULL
s are considered distinct. But if two rows have exactly the same subset of UK columns filled with non-NULL
values, the NULL
columns are ignored and the non-NULL
columns are decisive, just as if they constituted the entire unique key.
Added in: 1.5
Description: A USING INDEX subclause can be placed at the end of a primary, unique or foreign key definition. Its purpose is to
provide a user-defined name for the automatically created index that enforces the constraint, and
optionally define the index to be ascending or descending (the default being ascending).
Without USING INDEX, indices enforcing named constraints are named after the constraint (this is new behaviour in Firebird 1.5) and indices for unnamed constraints get names like RDB$FOREIGN13 or something equally romantic.
You must always provide a new name for the index. It is not possible to use pre-existing indices to enforce constraints.
USING INDEX can be applied at field level, at table level, and (in ALTER TABLE) with ADD CONSTRAINT. It works with named as well as unnamed key constraints. It does not work with CHECK constraints, as these don't have their own enforcing index.
Syntax:
[CONSTRAINTconstraint-name
]<constraint-type>
<constraint-definition>
[USING [ASC[ENDING] | DESC[ENDING]] INDEXindex_name
]
Examples:
The first example creates a primary key constraint PK_CUST using an index named IX_CUSTNO:
create table customers ( custno int not null constraint pk_cust primary key using index ix_custno, ...This, however:
create table customers ( custno int not null primary key using index ix_custno, ......will give you a PK constraint called INTEG_7 or something similar, and an index IX_CUSTNO.
Some more examples:
create table people ( id int not null, nickname varchar(12) not null, country char(4), .. .. constraint pk_people primary key (id), constraint uk_nickname unique (nickname) using index ix_nick )alter table people add constraint fk_people_country foreign key (country) references countries(code) using desc index ix_people_country
If you define a descending constraint-enforcing index on a primary or unique key, be sure to make any foreign keys referencing it descending as well.
Firebird Documentation Index → Firebird 1.5 Language Ref. Update → DDL statements → CREATE TABLE |